The government should spend money in promoting sports and art in school, rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
同意
Some people maintain that sports and art in school deserve more governmental funds than professional sports and art events in communities. I certainly agree with this opinion.
It is important to promote sports and art in school as it gives young people a chance to get involved. At their age, if interested in these two areas, they may keep their interest and participation in relevant activities throughout their lives. Sports participation is often treated as an excellent means to stay physically fit whereas art helps students express their creativity.
Besides, some sports contribute to team-building as students get to learn how to cooperate with each other if they expect to win. The sense of teamwork that these activities nurture has a definite value to the students, even if that value is sometimes difficult to measure.
In terms of the benefit of sponsoring a sports match or an art exhibition, it is easy to foster a sense of belonging and a sense of enjoyment within the community. Local pride is fostered when citizens can enjoy activities like watching their neighbors compete in matches or admiring the artwork of a girl next door. That being said, many professional sports have shown the ability to finance themselves. Sports like professional basketball and soccer are typical examples of profitable events since they receive financial support through ticket revenues, private sponsorships, and other merchandising ventures.
In conclusion, governments will probably be better served in promoting sports and art participation in school, as students are at an age when they are determining their interests, many of which will be life-long interests.