Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
应该保护
As globalization accelerates, people are arguing for the allocation of resources to save languages which have a diminishing number of speakers. Others say that spending money on such endeavors would be a waste of resources. I think all languages deserve to be saved because they stand for unique cultures and history.
The diverse nature of language is crucial to our understanding of culture and should be protected.
Furthermore, languages are the cornerstone of historical content and allow us to understand the lifestyles and customs of the past; without it, history is lost. For example, Native American tribes have lost the languages of their ancestors, which has left them detached from their origin. Therefore, the government must protect these smaller languages to ensure the culture continues to have an impact on modern day life. Importantly, it is impossible to regain specific cultural knowledge once it is lost.
On the other hand, it is believed that protecting smaller languages is a waste of money because no one can stop their inevitable extinction. The world is more connected because of the use of more common languages in communication. For example, English is now the lingua franca of the business world and it also dominates movie, music, and video game industries. This leads to fewer working barriers and offers more efficiency than communicating in less common languages. Nonetheless, it is essential to weigh up our rich history and determine whether gaining convenience and efficiency in communication is worth losing a crucial part of ancient culture.
Overall, I believe that it is better to save less utilized languages from dying out because they offer a glimpse into our past and contain valuable culture and history.